Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning
2011

Understanding Statistical Significance in Medicine

Sample size: 246 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Westover M, Brandon K D, Bianchi M T

Primary Institution: Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School

Hypothesis

Do physicians misunderstand the probabilistic logic of significance tests?

Conclusion

Most physicians misinterpret statistical significance, leading to incorrect conclusions about medical research.

Supporting Evidence

  • Over 90% of physicians answered incorrectly on a quiz about statistical significance.
  • Understanding Bayes' rule is essential for interpreting medical information.
  • Significance testing is often misunderstood and misapplied in medical research.

Takeaway

Doctors often get confused by statistics, especially when it comes to understanding if a treatment works or not.

Methodology

A quiz was administered to 246 physicians to assess their understanding of statistical significance.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in self-reported understanding of statistics and the limited scope of the quiz.

Limitations

The study only included physicians from two major academic hospitals, which may not represent all physicians.

Participant Demographics

Physicians from two major academic hospitals.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1741-7015-9-20

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication