Knowledge and Perceptions of Couples' Voluntary Counseling and Testing in Urban Rwanda and Zambia: A Cross-Sectional Household Survey
2011

Knowledge and Perceptions of Couples' Voluntary Counseling and Testing in Urban Rwanda and Zambia

Sample size: 1203 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kelley April L., Karita Etienne, Sullivan Patrick S., Katangulia Francois, Chomba Elwyn, Carael Michel, Telfair Joseph, Dunham Steve M., Vwalika Cheswa M., Kautzman Michele G., Wall Kristin M., Allen Susan A.

Primary Institution: Project San Francisco, Rwanda Zambia HIV Research Group, Kigali, Rwanda

Hypothesis

What are the knowledge, perceptions, and barriers to the use of couples' voluntary HIV counseling and testing (CVCT) among adults in Kigali, Rwanda and Lusaka, Zambia?

Conclusion

Most respondents had positive attitudes toward CVCT, but many were unaware of the possibility of HIV serodiscordance between cohabiting couples.

Supporting Evidence

  • Respondents in Kigali were more aware of HIV testing sites compared to those in Lusaka.
  • Knowledge of HIV serodiscordance was significantly higher among Kigali respondents.
  • Stigma and fear of partner reaction were identified as major barriers to CVCT.

Takeaway

This study found that many people in Rwanda and Zambia think testing for HIV together is good, but they don't know enough about it or where to go for help.

Methodology

Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted in Kigali, Rwanda (n=600) and Lusaka, Zambia (n=603) to assess knowledge, perceptions, and barriers to CVCT.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to convenience sampling and differences in population characteristics between the two cities.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable due to the non-random selection of individuals within households.

Participant Demographics

Equal proportions of men and women aged 15-60 years in Kigali and 15-49 years in Lusaka.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0019573

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication