Regional Differences in Health Among Older Adults in the UK
Author Information
Author(s): Fiona E Matthews, Laura L Miller, Carol Brayne, Carol Jagger
Primary Institution: Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS)
Hypothesis
This paper aims to describe regional differences in healthy life expectancy using a variety of states of health and wellbeing within the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS).
Conclusion
There are considerable differences in life experience across regions of the UK beyond basic life expectancy.
Supporting Evidence
- The prevalence of cognitive and functional impairment increases with age and varies by region.
- Newcastle had the shortest life expectancy, while Cambridgeshire and Oxford had the longest.
- Self-perceived health varies significantly across regions but not with age or sex.
Takeaway
Different areas in the UK have different levels of health for older people, and these differences are not just about how long people live but also about how healthy they feel.
Methodology
The study used a population-based approach with interviews covering self-perceived health, functional impairment, and cognitive impairment among 13,009 individuals aged 65 and above across five centres.
Potential Biases
There may be systematic differences in nonresponders across centres, which could affect the results.
Limitations
The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific regions studied, and there may be biases due to missing data.
Participant Demographics
Participants were aged 65 and above, with a roughly equal distribution across five centres in England and Wales.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website