Comparative Analyses of the Safety Profiles of Vitamin D Receptor Agonists: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the EudraVigilance Database
2024

Safety Profiles of Vitamin D Receptor Agonists

Sample size: 5369581 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Gáll Zsolt, Kolcsar Melinda, Barbieri Maria Antonietta, Irrera Natasha, Convertino Irma

Primary Institution: George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Romania

Hypothesis

This study aimed to analyze the safety profiles of VDR agonists using the EudraVigilance database, focusing on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported between 1 January 2004 and 23 June 2024.

Conclusion

The safety profiles of VDR agonists differ significantly between compounds, with active derivatives requiring close monitoring for serious complications.

Supporting Evidence

  • 5,369,581 reports were analyzed in the EudraVigilance system.
  • 17,947 reports (0.33%) involving 80,050 ADRs were linked to VDR agonists.
  • Serious ADRs were more prevalent with paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, and calcitriol than with cholecalciferol.
  • Hypercalcemia was a hallmark ADR for all VDR agonists.
  • Logistic regression highlighted dehydration, overdose, and concomitant administration of calcium salts as major predictors of hypercalcemia.

Takeaway

This study looked at how safe different vitamin D medications are by checking reports of side effects. Some types of these medications can cause more serious problems than others.

Methodology

Data for ten VDR agonists were collected from the EudraVigilance database and analyzed to identify specific safety signals and risk factors for ADRs using multiple logistic regression.

Potential Biases

The study may be affected by reporting bias, underreporting, and missing data.

Limitations

The EudraVigilance database only includes cases in which ADRs occurred, and the reliability of data may be affected by reporting bias and underreporting.

Participant Demographics

The majority of reports were from males (70.26%) and the age group of 18–64 years (32.47%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95%CI = 3332 to 9641

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ph17121686

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication