Evaluating the Southern Rural Access Program's Synergy
Author Information
Author(s): Pathman Donald E, Chuang Emmeline, Weiner Bryan J
Primary Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Hypothesis
Does promoting synergy among grant-funded initiatives enhance their impact?
Conclusion
Participants generally perceived that the SRAP's deliberate strategies yielded synergies that added to the program's impact.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants noted that synergies were achieved through relationship building among grantees and with outside agencies.
- The program's strategies included targeting funding to culturally and geographically similar states.
- Participants felt that inadequate funding sometimes hindered synergies and their sustainability.
Takeaway
The Southern Rural Access Program helped different health initiatives work together better, which made them more effective.
Methodology
Qualitative interviews with 39 key participants from the Southern Rural Access Program.
Potential Biases
Participants may have portrayed their experiences in an overly positive light due to social desirability.
Limitations
The study only reflects the views of participants directly involved in the SRAP, which may not capture external perspectives.
Participant Demographics
Participants included program directors and leaders from various health initiatives across eight southeastern U.S. states.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website