An evaluation of the Charlson co-morbidity score for predicting sepsis after elective major surgery
2011

Evaluating the Charlson Co-Morbidity Score for Predicting Sepsis After Major Surgery

Sample size: 101 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hampshire Peter A. Guha, Arpan Strong, Ann Parsons, Dawn Rowan Patricia

Primary Institution: Royal Liverpool University & Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust

Hypothesis

Does the Charlson co-morbidity score predict the incidence of sepsis after elective major surgery?

Conclusion

The duration of surgery, but not the Charlson co-morbidity score, may predict the incidence of sepsis after surgery.

Supporting Evidence

  • 27% of patients developed sepsis postoperatively.
  • Duration of surgery was associated with sepsis development.
  • CCS was associated with longer ICU stay but not with sepsis.
  • 58% of patients developed SIRS postoperatively.
  • Unplanned admissions accounted for 26% of all critical care admissions.

Takeaway

This study looked at how patient health scores and surgery length affect the chance of getting an infection after surgery. It found that how long the surgery takes is important, but the health score isn't.

Methodology

A prospective observational study of 101 patients undergoing elective major surgery, assessing factors like co-morbidity score, age, gender, and surgery duration.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the study being conducted in a specialized hospital with a selected patient population.

Limitations

The study had a small number of sepsis cases and was conducted in a single institution, limiting generalizability.

Participant Demographics

67% male, median age 66 years, 79% had documented malignancy.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.054

Confidence Interval

1.2 (0.99–1.44)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4103/0972-5229.78221

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication