Evaluating Experimental Bias and Completeness in Comparative Phosphoproteomics Analysis
2011

Evaluating Experimental Bias in Phosphoproteomics

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jos Boekhorst, Paul J. Boersema, Bastiaan B. J. Tops, Bas van Breukelen, Albert J. R. Heck, Berend Snel

Primary Institution: Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

How do different experimental workflows impact the analysis of phosphoproteomes?

Conclusion

The study shows that using the same experimental workflow significantly improves the overlap in comparative phosphoproteomics.

Supporting Evidence

  • The overlap between the tyrosine phosphoproteome of C. elegans and HeLa cells was found to be about 4%.
  • Using the same experimental workflow increased the overlap between datasets significantly.
  • The study highlights the importance of addressing experimental biases in phosphoproteomics.

Takeaway

This study looks at how different ways of measuring proteins can change the results we see, and it helps us understand how to compare these results better.

Methodology

The study analyzed phosphoproteomes using high-throughput mass spectrometry and compared datasets generated from different experimental techniques.

Potential Biases

Different enrichment strategies can lead to significant biases in the observed phosphoproteome.

Limitations

The study is limited by the incompleteness of current phosphoproteomics datasets and the biases introduced by different experimental workflows.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<1e-06

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0023276

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication