Translational medicine: science or wishful thinking?
2008

Translational Medicine: Science or Wishful Thinking?

Commentary Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Martin Wehling

Primary Institution: University of Heidelberg

Hypothesis

Can translational medicine effectively bridge the gap between research and patient care?

Conclusion

Translational medicine efforts are often more about terminology than actual progress in helping patients.

Supporting Evidence

  • Despite increased funding, the output of new medicines has been declining.
  • Translational medicine is often seen as a response to the challenges in moving from research to clinical application.
  • Many translational efforts lack a scientific backbone and are driven by funding rather than genuine progress.

Takeaway

Translational medicine is supposed to help turn research into real treatments for patients, but sometimes it just sounds good without real results.

Potential Biases

The author has potential conflicts of interest due to previous employment and current consulting roles in the pharmaceutical industry.

Limitations

The commentary discusses the lack of scientific methods and tools in translational medicine, which hinders its effectiveness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5876-6-31

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication