Translational medicine: science or wishful thinking?
2008
Translational Medicine: Science or Wishful Thinking?
Commentary
Evidence: low
Author Information
Author(s): Martin Wehling
Primary Institution: University of Heidelberg
Hypothesis
Can translational medicine effectively bridge the gap between research and patient care?
Conclusion
Translational medicine efforts are often more about terminology than actual progress in helping patients.
Supporting Evidence
- Despite increased funding, the output of new medicines has been declining.
- Translational medicine is often seen as a response to the challenges in moving from research to clinical application.
- Many translational efforts lack a scientific backbone and are driven by funding rather than genuine progress.
Takeaway
Translational medicine is supposed to help turn research into real treatments for patients, but sometimes it just sounds good without real results.
Potential Biases
The author has potential conflicts of interest due to previous employment and current consulting roles in the pharmaceutical industry.
Limitations
The commentary discusses the lack of scientific methods and tools in translational medicine, which hinders its effectiveness.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website