Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Duodenostomy and Jejunostomy
Author Information
Author(s): Yukio Nishiguchi, Yuichi Fuyuhiro, Jae-To Lee, Soon-Myoung Kang, Mitsuru Baba, Yuichi Arimoto, Kazuhiro Takeuchi, Yoshito Yamashita, Akira Shigesawa, Kazuhiko Yoshikawa, Michio Sowa
Primary Institution: First Department of Surgery, Osaka City University Medical School
Hypothesis
Is percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) a safe and effective alternative for patients requiring long-term nutritional support?
Conclusion
PEG, PED, and PEJ are rapid, safe, and useful procedures for patients with poor anesthetic or operative risks.
Supporting Evidence
- All patients were successfully placed with the feeding tubes.
- No major complications were experienced, and only a few minor complications occurred.
- Patients who had previously received gastrostomy could also undergo PED and PEJ successfully.
- Patients recovered respiratory function soon after the placement of PEG.
Takeaway
Doctors can use a special tube to help people eat when they can't swallow, and it's safer and easier than older methods.
Methodology
Patients were selected for PEG after determining no other method was superior, and the Sacks-Vine Gastrostomy Kit was used for the procedure.
Limitations
The study does not provide extensive data on long-term outcomes or complications beyond the immediate post-procedure period.
Participant Demographics
Patients ranged in age from 32 to 79 years, mostly with neurological impairments.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website