Exploring Views on Openness in Science
Author Information
Author(s): Alicia M. Grubb, Steve M. Easterbrook
Primary Institution: University of Toronto
Hypothesis
Is there a consensus among scientists on the meaning of openness in scientific research?
Conclusion
The study found a lack of consensus among scientists regarding key concepts related to openness in science.
Supporting Evidence
- Respondents believe the public lacks understanding of scientific research.
- Participants had conflicting views on the peer review process.
- All respondents agreed that publications and data should be freely accessible.
Takeaway
Scientists don't all agree on what it means to be open in research, and they have different ideas about sharing data and results.
Methodology
The study used a purposive sampling strategy and collected qualitative data through an open-ended questionnaire.
Potential Biases
The sample was drawn from specific advocacy groups, which may introduce bias.
Limitations
The study had a small sample size and may not represent the broader scientific community.
Participant Demographics
Most respondents were between 30-49 years old, male, and from North America or Europe.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website