Using Snaplage Residue as Fiber for Beef Cattle
Author Information
Author(s): Italo B G de Lima, Priscila J R Cruz, Lucas P C Borges, Mateus P Gionbelli, Marcio M Ladeira, Daniel W Shike, Daniel R Casagrande, Thiago F Bernardes
Primary Institution: University of Lavras
Hypothesis
Greater stocking rates on snaplage residue could negatively affect animal performance and meat quality due to a reduction in the availability of residue in the diet of finishing animals resulting in a higher risk of acidosis.
Conclusion
The study shows that while different stocking rates did not significantly affect animal performance, a higher stocking rate improved weight gain per area.
Supporting Evidence
- The high stocking rate increased gain per area by 100% compared to the low stocking rate.
- Animal performance was similar across both stocking rates despite differences in residue availability.
- Carcass characteristics and meat quality were not significantly affected by the stocking rate.
Takeaway
This study found that using snaplage residue for beef cattle is a good idea, and having more cattle on the same land can help them gain weight better without hurting their health.
Methodology
The study evaluated two stocking rates of heifers grazing snaplage residue and measured their performance, behavior, and carcass traits over 96 days.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the specific location and management practices used in the study.
Limitations
The study was conducted in a specific climate and may not be generalizable to all environments.
Participant Demographics
Crossbred beef heifers (Angus × Nellore) with an initial body weight of 276 ± 23 kg.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.88
Statistical Significance
p<0.01
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website