The Effect of a Nature-Based Gel on Gingival Inflammation and the Proteomic Profile of Crevicular Fluid: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2024

Nature-Based Gel for Gingivitis Treatment

Sample size: 20 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Figueiredo Luciene Cristina, Bueno-Silva Bruno, Denúncio Giovanna, Figueiredo Nathalia Freitas, da Cruz Daniele Ferreira, Shibli Jamil A., Borges Maria Helena R., Barão Valentim A. R., Haim Doron, Asbi Thabet

Primary Institution: Guarulhos University

Hypothesis

Does a nature-based gel effectively control gingival inflammation and alter the proteomic profile of gingival crevicular fluid compared to conventional toothpaste?

Conclusion

The nature-based gel achieved similar clinical outcomes to conventional toothpaste in controlling gingival inflammation but significantly altered the proteomic profile of gingival crevicular fluid.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study identified 480 proteins across all groups.
  • Both groups showed similar clinical benefits after 3 months.
  • The nature-based gel group had 78 exclusive proteins related to immune processes.
  • The conventional toothpaste group had 21 exclusive proteins mainly involved in wound healing.
  • Participants reported full adherence to the oral hygiene protocol.
  • No adverse effects were detected during the study.
  • Clinical parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Takeaway

A special gel made from natural ingredients works just as well as regular toothpaste for gum health, but it changes the proteins found in the mouth in a unique way.

Methodology

This was a double-blind, parallel, randomized, and controlled clinical trial comparing a nature-based gel and conventional toothpaste over 3 months.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the involvement of authors employed by a company related to the study.

Limitations

The sample size may have limited the ability to detect differences between the groups, and longer follow-up periods are needed to assess the maintenance of outcomes.

Participant Demographics

20 participants, aged 18-65, with gingivitis; 8 women and 2 men in the nature-based gel group, 7 women and 3 men in the control group.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/gels10120772

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication