Regulation of clinical research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies: A proposal
2006

Regulation of Clinical Research Sponsored by Pharmaceutical Companies

publication

Author Information

Author(s): Julio Sotelo

Primary Institution: National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Mexico

Hypothesis

A third party must be placed between clinical researchers and drug companies to improve the integrity of clinical trials.

Conclusion

The proposal for a Collegiate Research Council could enhance the reliability of clinical studies and public confidence in drug testing.

Supporting Evidence

  • Drug company marketing can distort prescribing patterns.
  • The medical profession must base its relationship with drug companies on academic and ethical aims.
  • Many trials go unpublished, particularly negative trials.

Takeaway

This study suggests that having a separate group oversee drug research can help make sure that the results are fair and trustworthy.

Methodology

The proposal outlines the creation of a Collegiate Research Council to oversee clinical trials and ensure independence from pharmaceutical companies.

Potential Biases

The current relationship between researchers and drug companies can create bias due to financial incentives.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030306

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication