Perceived quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder: related factors
2006

Quality of Life in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Sample size: 64 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rodriguez-Salgado Beatriz, Dolengevich-Segal Helen, Arrojo-Romero Manuel, Castelli-Candia Paola, Navio-Acosta Mercedes, Perez-Rodriguez Maria M, Saiz-Ruiz Jeronimo, Baca-Garcia Enrique

Primary Institution: Department of Psychiatry, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital

Hypothesis

OCD patients have worse quality of life perception than the general population, related to the severity of the clinical manifestations of the disorder.

Conclusion

Quality of life perception was different in OCD patients compared to the general population, influenced by the severity of the disorder and comorbidities.

Supporting Evidence

  • OCD patients scored lower in all SF-36 subscales compared to the general population.
  • Employment was linked to better quality of life scores in physical role.
  • Patients with medical comorbidity had worse scores in general health and social functioning.
  • Psychiatric comorbidity negatively impacted quality of life in multiple areas.

Takeaway

People with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) feel worse about their lives than most people, especially if they have other health issues.

Methodology

Patients were assessed using various scales including the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, Y-BOCS, Hamilton's depression scale, and SF-36.

Potential Biases

Use of general scales may bias results as they are not specific to psychiatric patients.

Limitations

The sample size limits control for gender and comorbidity, and the cross-sectional design may not accurately reflect perceived QOL.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"mean":36.4,"age_of_onset":20.7},"gender":{"male":45.3,"female":54.7},"marital_status":{"single":57.8,"married":40.6,"divorced":1.6},"employment_status":{"employed":59.4,"unemployed":40.6}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-244X-6-20

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication