Biomarkers of Radiosensitivity in A-Bomb Survivors Pregnant at the Time of Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
2011

Radiosensitivity in Pregnant A-Bomb Survivors

Sample size: 250 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Miles Edward F., Tatsukawa Yoshimi, Funamoto Sachiyo, Kamada Naoko, Nakashima Eiji, Kodama Yoshiaki, Seed Thomas, Kusonoki Yoichiro, Nakachi Kei, Fujiwara Saeko, Akahoshi Masazumi, Neriishi Kazuo

Primary Institution: Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF)

Hypothesis

Pregnant women exposed to radiation during the atomic bombings show increased radiosensitivity compared to non-pregnant women.

Conclusion

There is no statistically significant evidence of increased radiosensitivity in pregnant women exposed to radiation during the atomic bombings.

Supporting Evidence

  • Data on approximately 250 women were available to assess various health parameters.
  • Statistically significant overall dose-response increases were found for chromosome aberration frequency and GPA locus mutation rate.
  • The slope of the regression line for pregnant women indicated a suggestive increase in stable chromosome aberration frequency.

Takeaway

The study looked at women who were pregnant during the atomic bombings and found that they didn't seem to be more sensitive to radiation than women who weren't pregnant.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from the Adult Health Study database, comparing biomarkers in pregnant and non-pregnant women exposed to radiation.

Potential Biases

Selection bias due to low participation rates of pregnant women in the study.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size of pregnant women, particularly in the third trimester, which limited the ability to detect significant differences.

Participant Demographics

The study included women who were pregnant at the time of the bombings, with a comparison group of non-pregnant women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

P = .088 for HGB level; P < .001 for chromosome aberration frequency and GPA locus mutation rate.

Confidence Interval

95% CI not specified.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.5402/2011/264978

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication