Effectiveness of Handheld Computers vs. Paper for Data Collection
Author Information
Author(s): Lane Shannon J, Heddle Nancy M, Arnold Emmy, Walker Irwin
Primary Institution: McMaster University
Hypothesis
Are handheld computers more effective than paper methods for data collection in clinical research?
Conclusion
Handhelds are an effective alternative to paper and pencil modes of data collection; they are faster and were preferred by most users.
Supporting Evidence
- Handheld computers were preferred by most subjects in three out of four studies.
- Handheld computers improved timeliness of data handling in four studies.
- Data accuracy was found to be better in some studies using handheld computers.
Takeaway
Using handheld computers to collect data is faster and people like them more than using paper.
Methodology
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing handheld computers and paper methods for data collection.
Potential Biases
Potential publication bias and subject selection bias.
Limitations
None of the studies included all outcomes, and data accuracy varied across studies.
Participant Demographics
Included patients with various conditions such as overactive bladder, orthopedic issues, and diabetes.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.0001
Statistical Significance
p<0.0001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website