Difficulties in recruitment for a randomized controlled trial involving hysterosalpingography
2006

Challenges in Recruiting for a Hysterosalpingography Trial

Sample size: 759 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Perquin Denise AM, Craen Anton JM, Helmerhorst Frans M

Primary Institution: Leiden University Medical Centre

Hypothesis

What are the reasons for non-participation in a trial involving hysterosalpingography?

Conclusion

Most recruitment difficulties were due to unavoidable reasons, and improving communication and information could help increase participation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Out of 759 women, only 127 agreed to participate in the trial.
  • 73% of non-participation was due to exclusion criteria.
  • The most common reason for refusal was reluctance to undergo laparoscopy.

Takeaway

This study found that many women didn't join a fertility trial because of reasons they couldn't control, like being ineligible, and better communication could help more people participate.

Methodology

The study reviewed medical records of newly referred subfertile women to identify reasons for non-participation in a trial.

Potential Biases

There may be bias due to the specific criteria for referrals at an academic center.

Limitations

The study only examined one hospital's records, which may not represent all potential participants.

Participant Demographics

Subfertile women referred to the Reproductive Medicine Clinic.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1742-4755-3-5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication