Diversity in Fishing Knowledge Improves Estimates
Author Information
Author(s): Benjamin L. H. Jones, Rolando O. Santos, James W. Ryan, Samuel Shephard, Aaron J. Adams, Ross E. Boucek, Lucy Coals, Sophia V. Costa, Leanne C. Cullen-Unsworth, Jennifer S. Rehage
Primary Institution: Florida International University
Hypothesis
Does stakeholder diversity improve the accuracy of fishing quality estimates in data-poor fisheries?
Conclusion
Diverse groups of fishers provide more accurate estimates of fishing quality than homogenous groups.
Supporting Evidence
- Estimates from diverse groups outperformed those from homogenous groups.
- Targeting 31% of the sample size captured 75% of unique responses.
- Smaller diverse crowds were as effective as larger crowds in estimating ecological state.
Takeaway
When many different people share their fishing experiences, we get a better idea of how fish populations are doing than if we only ask a few similar people.
Methodology
The study used an online survey to gather fishing quality estimates from a diverse group of recreational anglers and guides.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the varying experiences and motivations of different age groups and fishing backgrounds.
Limitations
The study may not fully capture all aspects of local knowledge due to reliance on self-reported data.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 172 anglers and 38 guides, with a majority over 45 years old.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website