Assessment of ante mortem welfare indicators and the pathophysiology of captive-bolt trauma in equids at slaughter
2024

Welfare Indicators and Captive-Bolt Trauma in Slaughtered Horses

Sample size: 62 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Katharine A Fletcher, Barbara Padalino, Martina Felici, Daniele Bigi, Georgina Limon-Vega, Andrew Grist, Troy J Gibson

Primary Institution: Royal Veterinary College

Hypothesis

There would be an association between ante mortem welfare indicators and stunning effectiveness.

Conclusion

The study found that mitigating ante mortem stress could improve stunning effectiveness in horses at slaughter.

Supporting Evidence

  • All animals in the study showed stress-related behaviours at all stages of the slaughter process.
  • 53% of horses slipped in the stunning box, with poor floor surface condition associated with this.
  • 22% of animals showed signs of ineffective stunning.
  • Damage to critical brainstem structures was found in 85% of heads assessed post mortem.

Takeaway

This study looked at how horses are treated before they are killed for meat and found that if they are less stressed, they are more likely to be stunned properly.

Methodology

The study assessed the welfare of 62 horses at a commercial abattoir using animal-based measures to identify stress-related behaviors and stunning effectiveness.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the presence of researchers affecting the behavior of abattoir staff and animals.

Limitations

The study was limited by the sample size and the observational nature, which may have influenced the behavior of the abattoir personnel.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"less_than_2.5_years":42,"between_2.5_and_6_years":10,"between_6_and_12_years":12,"between_12_and_21_years":30,"greater_than_21_years":7},"sex":{"male":51,"female":49},"breed_type":{"draught":34,"native_pony":35,"sports_horse":31},"country_of_origin":{"france":57,"poland":17,"italy":12,"hungary":5,"czech_republic":5,"slovenia":3,"romania":1}}

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1017/awf.2024.70

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication