Body mass index and waist-to-height ratio effect on mortality in non-alcoholic fatty liver: revisiting the obesity paradox
2024

Impact of Body Mass Index and Waist-to-Height Ratio on Mortality in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Sample size: 4444 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Jiang Hao, Li Mingkai, Yu Hongsheng, Huang Yinan, Yang Bilan, Wu Bin, Yang Yidong

Primary Institution: Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

Hypothesis

Does the obesity paradox in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease persist after accounting for smoking and reverse causation?

Conclusion

The obesity paradox in NAFLD patients can be explained by smoking and reverse causation, with waist-to-height ratio being a better predictor of mortality than BMI.

Supporting Evidence

  • Over a median follow-up period of 20.3 years, 1832 participants passed away.
  • Individuals classified as overweight or obese presented reduced mortality risks compared to normal weight individuals.
  • The obesity paradox vanished upon adjustments for smoking and exclusion of the initial 5-year follow-up period.
  • WHtR was a better predictor of mortality than BMI.

Takeaway

This study found that being overweight or obese might not be as bad for people with liver disease as we thought, but it’s important to consider other factors like smoking.

Methodology

Data from NHANES III was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression to assess mortality risk associated with BMI and WHtR.

Potential Biases

Potential biases from smoking and reverse causation were significant confounding factors.

Limitations

The study did not account for changes in weight or waist circumference during follow-up and had a small number of underweight participants.

Participant Demographics

Median age was 45.25 years, with 49.62% male and 72.31% classified as overweight or obese.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.925–0.927 for overweight; 95% CI 0.981–0.984 for obesity class I

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fendo.2024.1419715

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication