Action Being Character: A Promising Perspective on the Solution Concept of Game Theory
2011
Understanding Decision Making in Game Theory
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): Deng Kuiying, Chu Tianguang
Primary Institution: Peking University, Beijing, China
Hypothesis
Can incorporating players' character improve the predictions of game theory?
Conclusion
The study suggests that considering players' character can better explain their behaviors in social decision-making situations.
Supporting Evidence
- The study shows that players' decisions in games often contradict traditional game theory predictions.
- Experimental data indicate that players do not always act as self-regarding utility maximizers.
- The proposed framework can explain why players cooperate in situations where traditional models predict defection.
Takeaway
This study shows that how people act in games can be better understood by looking at their personal traits, like being cooperative or competitive.
Methodology
The study analyzes five paradigmatic games using a new framework that incorporates players' character into game theory.
Limitations
The measurement of players' character and its influence on decision-making is complex and not fully addressed.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website