Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer – a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome
2000

Gemcitabine plus best supportive care for lung cancer

Sample size: 300 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Anderson H, Hopwood P, Stephens R J, Thatcher N, Cottier B, Nicholson M, Milroy R, Maughan T S, Falk S J, Bond M G, Burt P A, Connolly C K, McIllmurray M B, Carmichael J

Primary Institution: Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester

Hypothesis

Does gemcitabine plus best supportive care improve quality of life compared to best supportive care alone in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer?

Conclusion

Patients treated with gemcitabine plus best supportive care reported better quality of life and reduced disease-related symptoms compared to those receiving best supportive care alone.

Supporting Evidence

  • The percentage change in mean symptom score was a 10% decrease for gemcitabine plus BSC and a 1% increase for BSC alone.
  • A sustained improvement in symptom score was recorded in 22% of gemcitabine + BSC patients compared to 9% of BSC patients.
  • Tumour response occurred in 19% of gemcitabine patients.
  • The median overall survival was similar between the two groups, with 5.7 months for gemcitabine + BSC and 5.9 months for BSC.

Takeaway

This study found that giving a medicine called gemcitabine along with regular care helps people with lung cancer feel better than just regular care alone.

Methodology

A randomized multicentre trial comparing gemcitabine plus best supportive care to best supportive care alone, focusing on quality of life and symptom assessment.

Limitations

No difference in overall survival was observed between the treatment groups.

Participant Demographics

Patients with symptomatic, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, balanced for age, gender, Karnofsky performance status, and disease stage.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0014

Confidence Interval

95% CI 13–27 for tumor response; 95% CI 4.6–7.6 for gemcitabine + BSC overall survival; 95% CI 5.0–7.9 for BSC overall survival

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1054/bjoc.2000.1307

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication