Rapid Urban Malaria Appraisal (RUMA) II: Epidemiology of urban malaria in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)
2006

Urban Malaria Study in Dar es Salaam

Sample size: 1054 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Wang Shr-Jie, Lengeler Christian, Mtasiwa Deodatus, Mshana Thomas, Manane Lusinge, Maro Godson, Tanner Marcel

Primary Institution: Swiss Tropical Institute

Hypothesis

How does urbanization affect malaria prevalence in Dar es Salaam?

Conclusion

The number of clinical malaria cases was much lower than routine reporting suggested.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only 5.2% of fever cases were positive for malaria.
  • Malaria prevalence was low in school surveys, ranging from 0.8% to 3.7%.
  • High coverage of insecticide-treated nets was associated with reduced malaria risk.

Takeaway

This study looked at how many people in Dar es Salaam have malaria. It found that fewer people have it than doctors thought.

Methodology

A rapid assessment of urban malaria was conducted using a standard RUMA methodology, including school parasitaemia surveys and health facility fever surveys.

Potential Biases

Potential over-reporting of malaria cases due to reliance on health facility data.

Limitations

The study was conducted during a dry season, which may not represent malaria prevalence during wetter periods.

Participant Demographics

Participants included schoolchildren aged 6-12 years and patients presenting with fever at health facilities.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.2–2.6

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2875-5-28

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication