Feasibility of non‐anesthesiologist‐administered sedation with dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection of upper gastrointestinal tumors
2024

Sedation by Non-Anesthesiologists During Endoscopic Procedures

Sample size: 68 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ishido Kenji, Tanabe Satoshi, Kitahara Gen, Furue Yasuaki, Wada Takuya, Watanabe Akinori, Matsuda Hiromi, Okamoto Hirotsugu, Kusano Chika

Primary Institution: Kitasato University School of Medicine

Hypothesis

The efficacy and safety of a sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam during endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear.

Conclusion

A sedation regimen combining dexmedetomidine and midazolam can be feasibly administered by non-anesthesiologists.

Supporting Evidence

  • All endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures were completed successfully.
  • No severe sedation-related adverse events were reported.
  • The median treatment time was 68 minutes for superficial esophageal cancer and 84 minutes for early gastric cancer and adenoma.
  • The en-bloc resection rate was 92.2% for superficial esophageal cancer and 100% for early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma.
  • All 22 non-anesthesiologists who underwent the proficiency evaluation passed the test.

Takeaway

Doctors who aren't anesthesiologists can safely give patients sedation during certain procedures using a specific combination of medications.

Methodology

The study retrospectively evaluated 68 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, with sedation administered by non-anesthesiologists under supervision.

Potential Biases

Selection bias may exist due to the nature of clinical practice.

Limitations

The study was a single-center, retrospective, observational study without randomized controlled trials for comparison.

Participant Demographics

Median age was 74 years for superficial esophageal cancer and 75 years for early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma; no patients had a BMI >35 kg/m2.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.012

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/deo2.70045

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication