Measures of Adiposity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, New York City Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2004
2011

Adiposity Measures and Heart Disease Risk in NYC

Sample size: 1912 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gwynn R. Charon, Magdalena Berger, Waddell Elizabeth Needham, Lorna E. Thorpe, Renu K. Garg, Robyn Philburn

Primary Institution: Columbia University

Hypothesis

Which measure of adiposity optimally predicts cardiovascular disease risk across different racial/ethnic groups?

Conclusion

New York City has a lower prevalence of obesity and elevated waist circumference but a higher prevalence of elevated waist-to-height ratio compared to national averages.

Supporting Evidence

  • The prevalence of obesity among NYC HANES participants was 26%, significantly lower than the national estimate of 31%.
  • Most measures of excess adiposity were significantly associated with all cardiovascular disease risk factors.
  • No single measure of excess adiposity was consistently predictive of cardiovascular disease risk across all racial/ethnic groups.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different ways of measuring body fat relate to heart disease risk in New York City adults. It found that while obesity rates are lower in NYC, waist-to-height ratios are higher.

Methodology

The study used data from the NYC Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, comparing obesity and other adiposity measures with cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Potential Biases

Potential recall bias for self-reported data and measurement error in examination components.

Limitations

The study is cross-sectional, limiting causal inferences, and some subgroup analyses had small sample sizes leading to wide confidence intervals.

Participant Demographics

Participants were noninstitutionalized adults aged 20 and older from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds in New York City.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.5888/pcd8.100058

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication