Eligibility, the ICF and the UN Convention: Australian perspectives
2011

Australian Perspectives on Disability Policy and the UN Convention

Sample size: 245746 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ros Madden, Nick Glozier, Elias Mpofu, Gwynnyth Llewellyn

Primary Institution: The University of Sydney

Hypothesis

How can the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) support the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Australia?

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the need for an integrated approach to disability policy in Australia, utilizing the ICF to enhance data collection and service provision.

Supporting Evidence

  • An estimated 20% of the Australian population had a disability in 2003.
  • The Disability Support Pension population was 732,367 in June 2008.
  • Almost 70% of service users needed support in education, work, and community life.

Takeaway

This study talks about how Australia can better support people with disabilities by using a specific framework to understand their needs and improve services.

Methodology

The paper discusses the Australian disability system, focusing on income support and specialist disability support services, and suggests improvements based on the ICF.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the focus on national programs without considering state-based schemes.

Limitations

The paper does not cover all related programs such as anti-discrimination measures and aged care.

Participant Demographics

The study includes data on disability support service users, predominantly under age 65, with a gender distribution of 56.5% male and 43.5% female.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S6

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication