Comparing Two Methods for Fixing Quadrilateral Plate Fractures
Author Information
Author(s): Moussa Islam Sayed, Nagy Amr Mohammed
Primary Institution: Ain Shams University
Hypothesis
Using the supra-pectineal QLP would provide much more rigid fixation and a strong buttress for medial wall migration, as well as a better functional and radiological outcome.
Conclusion
The anatomical QLP made it easier to reduce and fix acetabular fractures with a displaced medial wall, resulting in less morbidity than the classic infra-pectineal plating.
Supporting Evidence
- The anatomical QLP group had a mean operation time of 100.3 minutes, significantly shorter than the infra-pectineal group at 110 minutes.
- The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the anatomical QLP group (461.7 ml) compared to the infra-pectineal group (635.3 ml).
- Both groups had similar final radiological and clinical outcomes.
Takeaway
Doctors compared two ways to fix broken bones in the hip area. They found that one method was quicker and caused less bleeding, but both methods worked similarly in the end.
Methodology
This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a level 1 trauma center, comparing two surgical methods for fixing quadrilateral plate fractures.
Potential Biases
Performance bias may have been present as a single team performed all operations.
Limitations
The sample size was small, and the follow-up duration was short.
Participant Demographics
Patients aged 16 to 60 with quadrilateral plate fractures.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p=0.02 for operation time, p<0.001 for blood loss
Confidence Interval
95%
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website