Spheres of Influence: A Changing Climate of Litigation
2007

Climate Change Litigation: A Growing Trend

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Richard Dahl

Primary Institution: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Hypothesis

Can climate change litigation effectively influence public policy and environmental regulation?

Conclusion

Litigation related to climate change is increasing, but its effectiveness in driving meaningful policy change remains uncertain.

Supporting Evidence

  • Plaintiffs have not achieved significant victories in climate change lawsuits to date.
  • Litigation is seen as a last resort by environmentalists due to lack of federal action.
  • California is actively pursuing legal action against automakers for greenhouse gas emissions.

Takeaway

People are suing companies and governments because they think they are causing climate change, but it's hard to win these cases. It's like trying to fix a big problem with just a few small actions.

Potential Biases

The judicial branch may not be the appropriate venue for resolving complex climate policy issues.

Limitations

Litigation provides a piecemeal approach to addressing climate change rather than comprehensive legislative action.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication