Exploring Technology Acceptance of Healthcare Devices: The Moderating Role of Device Type and Generation
2024

Understanding User Acceptance of Healthcare Devices

Sample size: 1158 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Kim Seieun, Zhong Yinai, Wang Jue, Kim Hak-Seon, Wörtche Heinrich

Primary Institution: Kyungsung University

Hypothesis

What factors influence the technology acceptance of healthcare devices?

Conclusion

The study found that user attitudes and trust significantly influence the intention to adopt healthcare devices, with generational differences and device types playing moderating roles.

Supporting Evidence

  • Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived risk significantly influence user attitudes.
  • Attitude fully mediates the effects of performance expectancy and effort expectancy on behavioral intention.
  • Trust is influenced by performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and perceived risk.

Takeaway

People are more likely to use healthcare devices if they find them useful and easy to use, and their feelings about these devices can change based on their age and the type of device.

Methodology

The study used an online survey to collect data from users of radar sensors and wearable devices, analyzing responses with SmartPLS 4.0.

Potential Biases

The focus on specific device types may not capture the full spectrum of user experiences with all healthcare technologies.

Limitations

The study used convenience sampling, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

{"gender":{"male":49.6,"female":50.4},"age_groups":{"under_20":2.9,"20s":52.4,"30s":32.6,"over_40":12.1},"nationality":{"Indonesian":52.2,"Chinese":32.8,"Vietnamese":11.7},"education":{"bachelor_degree":60.8,"postgraduate":15.7,"high_school_or_below":8.6}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/s24247921

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication