Checklist for Reporting Homeopathic Research
Author Information
Author(s): B. Stock-Schröer, H. Albrecht, L. Betti, G. Dobos, C. Endler, K. Linde, R. Lüdtke, F. Musial, R. van Wijk, C. Witt, S. Baumgartner
Primary Institution: Karl and Veronica Carstens-Foundation, D-Essen, Germany
Hypothesis
The study aims to develop a criteria catalogue to improve the quality of reporting experiments in basic research in homeopathy.
Conclusion
The study resulted in a checklist with 23 criteria to enhance the quality of reporting in homeopathic research.
Supporting Evidence
- The checklist aims to improve transparency and quality in homeopathic research reporting.
- Accurate reporting is essential for the critical interpretation of research findings.
- Previous efforts to enhance reporting quality in clinical research informed the checklist development.
Takeaway
This study created a list of important things researchers should include when writing about homeopathy experiments to make their work clearer and more reliable.
Methodology
A Delphi Process was used, involving three rounds of adjustments and two consensus conferences with European researchers.
Potential Biases
The small sample of experts involved in the Delphi process may introduce bias in the checklist development.
Limitations
The checklist may not cover all aspects of homeopathic research due to the complexity and variability of experiments.
Participant Demographics
European researchers who published experimental work in homeopathy within the last 5 years.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website