Improving Patient Care for Bacteremia with Cardiac Devices
Author Information
Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Velez Oquendo Gabriel, Mahmood Riaz, Ahn Joon, Robinson Shane
Primary Institution: Northeast Georgia Medical Center Gainesville
Hypothesis
Can implementing a best practice advisory in electronic health records improve the identification and management of patients with bacteremia and cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Conclusion
The implementation of the best practice advisory did not show significant improvements but indicated positive trends in consultations and device extractions over time.
Supporting Evidence
- The BPA resulted in a nonsignificant increase in EP consultations from 19.66% to 25.88%.
- EP consults were a significant predictor for device extractions with an odds ratio of 9.4644.
- The mortality rate decreased from 17.42% to 14.13% after BPA implementation.
- The study included 447 patients diagnosed with bacteremia and CIED.
- Most patients in the post-BPA group had more comorbidities compared to the pre-BPA group.
Takeaway
This study looked at how a reminder system in hospitals can help doctors notice when patients with heart devices have infections, which could help them get better care.
Methodology
Data was collected from electronic medical records to identify patients with bacteremia and cardiac devices, comparing outcomes before and after the implementation of a best practice advisory.
Potential Biases
Potential biases related to data collection and reporting due to the retrospective design.
Limitations
The study's retrospective nature may introduce biases, and it was conducted in a single healthcare system, limiting generalizability.
Participant Demographics
Most patients were male, White, and had a mean age of approximately 67 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p = 0.168
Confidence Interval
95% CI: 4.7744-18.7614
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website