Medical Complicity in Torture at Guantánamo Bay: Evidence Is the First Step Toward Justice
2011

Neglect of Medical Evidence of Torture in Guantánamo Bay

Sample size: 9 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vincent Iacopino, Stephen Xenakis

Primary Institution: Physicians for Human Rights

Hypothesis

Did medical personnel at Guantánamo Bay neglect or conceal evidence of torture?

Conclusion

Medical personnel at Guantánamo Bay failed to document evidence of intentional harm in detainees.

Supporting Evidence

  • All nine detainees alleged torture and ill treatment.
  • Medical records indicated significant psychological symptoms among detainees.
  • Medical personnel failed to document causes of observed injuries and symptoms.
  • Psychological assessments revealed diagnostic criteria for PTSD in all cases.
  • Medical affidavits corroborated allegations of torture with physical and psychological evidence.

Takeaway

This study looked at nine people held at Guantánamo Bay and found that doctors didn't report signs of torture they saw.

Methodology

Reviewed medical records and case files of nine detainees for evidence of torture and ill treatment.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to reliance on medical records that may have been edited.

Limitations

Findings may not be generalizable to other detainees and are based on potentially redacted records.

Participant Demographics

All nine detainees were male, with an average age of 33 at the time of incarceration.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.pmed.1001027

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication