Father's occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and childhood acute leukemia: a new method to assess exposure (a case-control study)
2008

Father's Job Exposure and Childhood Leukemia

Sample size: 193 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Maria Luisa Perez-Saldivar, Manuel Carlos Ortega-Alvarez, Arturo Fajardo-Gutierrez, Roberto Bernaldez-Rios, Maria de los Angeles del Campo-Martinez, Aurora Medina-Sanson, Miguel Angel Palomo-Colli, Rogelio Paredes-Aguilera, Armando Martinez-Avalos, Victor Hugo Borja-Aburto, Maria de Jesus Rodriguez-Rivera, Victor Manuel Vargas-Garcia, Jesus Zarco-Contreras, Janet Flores-Lujano, Juan Manuel Mejia-Arangure

Primary Institution: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), DF, Mexico

Hypothesis

Is there an association between a father's occupational exposure to carcinogenic agents and the development of acute leukemia in their children?

Conclusion

Children whose fathers have been exposed to high levels of carcinogenic agents seem to have a greater risk of developing acute leukemia.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study used a new exposure index to assess occupational exposure.
  • Children with fathers in high-risk occupations had higher odds of developing leukemia.
  • The study matched cases and controls by age, sex, and institution.

Takeaway

If a dad works with harmful chemicals, it might make his kids more likely to get sick with leukemia.

Methodology

A case-control study was conducted with 193 children diagnosed with acute leukemia and matched controls, using a questionnaire and an occupational exposure index to assess exposure levels.

Potential Biases

Recall bias may have affected the accuracy of reported occupational exposures.

Limitations

Confounding factors could not be completely controlled due to incomplete data.

Participant Demographics

Children under 16 years of age from Mexico City.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.003

Confidence Interval

1.69 (0.98, 2.92) for preconception exposure; 1.98 (1.13, 3.45) during pregnancy; 2.11 (1.17, 3.78) during breastfeeding; 2.17 (1.28, 3.66) after birth; 2.06 (1.24, 3.42) for global exposure.

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2407-8-7

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication