Management of Cardiac Tamponade: A Comparative Study between Echo-Guided Pericardiocentesis and Surgery—A Report of 100 Patients
2011

Management of Cardiac Tamponade: Comparing Echo-Guided Pericardiocentesis and Surgery

Sample size: 100 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hasan Ali Gumrukcuoglu, Dolunay Odabasi, Serkan Akdag, Hasan Ekim

Primary Institution: Yuzuncu Yil University

Hypothesis

What is the optimal method for draining pericardial fluid in patients with cardiac tamponade?

Conclusion

Echo-guided pericardiocentesis is the preferred treatment for cardiac tamponade due to its lower complication and mortality rates.

Supporting Evidence

  • Echo-guided pericardiocentesis was performed in 38% of patients.
  • Primary surgical treatment was performed in 36% of patients.
  • Surgical treatment following pericardiocentesis was performed in 26% of patients.
  • Recurrence of tamponade before 90 days was highest in the echo-guided group.
  • Total complication rates and mortality were highest in the surgical treatment group.

Takeaway

Doctors looked at 100 patients with a serious heart condition called cardiac tamponade and found that a less invasive procedure using ultrasound is usually better than surgery.

Methodology

The study reviewed 100 patients with cardiac tamponade who underwent either echo-guided pericardiocentesis, primary surgical treatment, or surgical treatment following pericardiocentesis.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and subject to biases inherent to this design.

Participant Demographics

51% female and 49% male, ages ranging from 10 to 79 years with a mean age of 46.3 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4061/2011/197838

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication