A randomised study comparing standard dose carboplatin with chlorambucil and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer
1992

Comparing Carboplatin Alone vs. Carboplatin with Chlorambucil in Ovarian Cancer

Sample size: 161 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): E.M. Rankin, L. Mill, S.B. Kaye, R. Atkinson, L. Cassidy, J. Cordiner, D. Cruickshank, J. Davis, I.D. Duncan, W. Fullerton, T. Habeshaw, J. Kennedy, R. Kennedy, H. Kitchener, A. MacLean, J. Paul, N. Reed, T. Sarker, M. Soukop, G.H. Swapp, R.P. Symonds

Primary Institution: Beatson Oncology Centre, Western Infirmary, Glasgow

Hypothesis

Is there a clinically significant difference in treatment results between the use of carboplatin as a single agent at full dose and its use in combination with chlorambucil?

Conclusion

There is no major clinical advantage to adding chlorambucil to carboplatin for treating advanced ovarian cancer.

Supporting Evidence

  • The median progression-free survival was similar for both treatment arms.
  • 52% of patients received dose escalations based on blood counts.
  • Failure to achieve significant leucopenia was associated with worse progression-free survival.

Takeaway

Doctors wanted to see if using two medicines together would work better than just one for women with advanced ovarian cancer, but they found out that using just one medicine was just as good.

Methodology

Patients were randomized to receive either carboplatin alone or carboplatin with chlorambucil, and their progression-free survival and overall survival were compared.

Limitations

The study was closed early, and the sample size was smaller than initially planned.

Participant Demographics

Patients were previously untreated women with FIGO stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.830

Confidence Interval

0.67-1.39

Statistical Significance

p=0.830

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication