Surgical Treatment Intensity at the End of Life in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review
2024

Surgical Treatment Intensity at the End of Life in Cancer Patients

Sample size: 39 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lawday Samuel BMBS, MByRes, Zucker Benjamin E. MA, MBBS, MRCS, Gardner Shona MBChB, MRCS, Robb James MBChB, MA, Leandro Lorna MA, BM, BCh, Hollingworth William PhD, Blazeby Jane MBChB, MD, McNair Angus G.K. PhD, FRCS, Chamberlain Charlotte PhD, MRCP

Primary Institution: NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Hypothesis

What is the intensity of surgical treatment received by cancer patients at the end of life?

Conclusion

A significant number of cancer patients undergo invasive procedures at the end of life, but there is considerable variation in reporting and practice.

Supporting Evidence

  • Up to 79% of patients underwent invasive procedures in the last month of life.
  • High-quality research in surgical care at the end of life is lacking.
  • Patients who are younger and have higher household incomes tend to receive more aggressive treatment.
  • Geographical variation affects treatment intensity at the end of life.
  • Palliative care referrals are linked to reduced treatment intensity.
  • Healthcare costs in the last year of life can be significantly higher than in other years.
  • Significant reporting heterogeneity exists in the literature regarding surgical care at the end of life.
  • Identification of inappropriate surgical treatment intensity at the end of life is currently not possible.

Takeaway

Many cancer patients have surgeries in their last days, but it's unclear if these surgeries help them or just add to their suffering.

Methodology

This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included observational studies on surgical intensity at the end of life in adult cancer patients.

Potential Biases

High or moderate risk of bias was identified in 23 studies due to unrepresentative samples and retrospective data.

Limitations

There is significant heterogeneity in reporting practices and inclusion criteria across studies, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Participant Demographics

The studies included a range of cancer types and demographics, with a median sample size of 8814 participants.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1097/AS9.0000000000000514

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication