Developing a Standard Operating Procedure for Economic Evaluation in Clinical Trials
Author Information
Author(s): Rhiannon T Edwards, Barry Hounsome, Pat Linck, Ian T Russell
Primary Institution: Bangor University
Hypothesis
Should UKCRC require a standard operating procedure for economic evaluation in trials?
Conclusion
The study argues that UKCRC should mandate a standard operating procedure for economic evaluation in all registered trials units.
Supporting Evidence
- Pragmatic randomised trials are recognized as the best method for economic evaluation.
- The marginal cost of collecting economic data alongside clinical data is typically modest.
- No other UKCRC-registered trials unit currently has an economic SOP.
Takeaway
This study suggests that having a clear procedure for evaluating costs in clinical trials can help make the trials better and more reliable.
Methodology
Collaboration between health economists and trialists to develop a standard operating procedure for economic evaluation.
Limitations
The main limitations are the length of follow-up in trials and the limited number of treatment options compared.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website