The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research
2006

Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: Understanding Healthcare Provider Attitudes

Sample size: 10843 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Sexton John B, Helmreich Robert L, Neilands Torsten B, Rowan Kathy, Vella Keryn, Boyden James, Roberts Peter R, Thomas Eric J

Primary Institution: The University of Texas Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice

Hypothesis

Can the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire effectively measure healthcare provider attitudes related to patient safety?

Conclusion

The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties and can be used by healthcare organizations to assess and improve caregiver attitudes towards patient safety.

Supporting Evidence

  • The SAQ has been used in various healthcare settings to assess safety climate.
  • Results showed substantial variability in safety attitudes across different clinical areas.
  • The SAQ demonstrated strong reliability with a coefficient of 0.90.
  • Healthcare organizations can benchmark their safety climate against the data from this study.
  • Improvements in safety attitudes were linked to quality improvement interventions.
  • SAQ scores correlated with other measures of safety climate, indicating convergent validity.

Takeaway

This study shows that healthcare workers have different feelings about safety at work, and we can use a special questionnaire to understand and improve those feelings.

Methodology

Six cross-sectional surveys were conducted with healthcare providers across 203 clinical areas in three countries, analyzing responses using multilevel factor analyses.

Potential Biases

Some factor loadings were smaller at the clinical area level compared to the individual level, indicating potential bias in group-level assessments.

Limitations

The study could not assess factor structure invariance across different countries or job categories.

Participant Demographics

Participants included full- and part-time healthcare staff from various clinical areas, including critical care units and ambulatory clinics.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-6-44

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication