Differences in vascular response between primary and transplanted tumours
1991

Differences in Vascular Response Between Primary and Transplanted Tumours

Sample size: 28 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): S.B. Field, S. Needham, I.A. Burney, R.J. Maxwell, J.E. Coggle, J.R. Griffiths

Primary Institution: MRC Cyclotron Unit, Hammersmith Hospital

Hypothesis

Is the vascular response similar in primary tumours and in transplanted tumours derived from them?

Conclusion

The study found that transplanted tumours responded significantly better to hydralazine than primary tumours.

Supporting Evidence

  • 16 out of 17 transplanted tumours responded to hydralazine.
  • Only 4 out of 11 primary tumours responded to hydralazine.
  • The difference in response rates between primary and transplanted tumours was statistically significant.

Takeaway

This study looked at how two types of tumours react to a drug that affects blood flow, and found that one type reacted much more than the other.

Methodology

The study involved injecting hydralazine into mice with primary and transplanted tumours and measuring changes in metabolism using 31P Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.

Potential Biases

The results may be influenced by the differences in the histology and growth rates of the tumours.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and the primary tumours were all radiation-induced, which may affect their response.

Participant Demographics

Mice used were of various strains including SAS/4, CD1, CBA, and C57BI.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Statistical Significance

p=0.001

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication