How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image? An experimental study
2008

Impact of Plain Cigarette Packaging on Smokers' Perceptions

Sample size: 813 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Wakefield M A, Germain D, Durkin S J

Primary Institution: Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria

Hypothesis

Smokers will rate an original branded pack more positively than their plain pack counterparts, and that plain packs with progressively fewer brand-associated elements will be rated more negatively.

Conclusion

Plain packaging policies that remove most brand design elements are likely to be most successful in removing cigarette brand image associations.

Supporting Evidence

  • Plain packs with fewer branding elements are perceived unfavourably by smokers.
  • Smokers rated plain packs as less attractive and less popular.
  • Plain packaging may increase the salience of health warnings.

Takeaway

This study found that cigarette packs with less branding are seen as less appealing by smokers, which could help reduce smoking.

Methodology

A 3 (brand types) Ă— 4 (degree of plain packaging) between-subject experimental design was used, exposing adult smokers to different cigarette pack designs and collecting their ratings.

Potential Biases

The internet method of survey administration may have allowed some smokers to seek input from others, potentially affecting responses.

Limitations

The study used an 11-point response scale that produced an irregular response distribution, and the sample may not be representative of the general population.

Participant Demographics

62% female, 81% aged 30 or older, varied educational attainment, and socio-economic status based on Australian Bureau of Statistics norms.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/tc.2008.026732

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication