Collaborative Working Group Method for Pre-Trial Knowledge Mobilisation
Author Information
Author(s): Breckenridge J. P., Gossage-Worrall R., Chadwick P., De Zoysa N., Elliott J., Gianfrancesco C., Hamilton K., Lawton J., Rankin D., Stanton-Fay S., Coates E.
Primary Institution: University of Dundee
Hypothesis
How can a structured approach to collaborative decision-making improve the refinement of complex interventions before trials?
Conclusion
The Collaborative Working Group (CWG) method is an effective approach for refining complex interventions pre-trial through collaborative knowledge sharing.
Supporting Evidence
- The CWG method was perceived as acceptable and useful for refining interventions.
- Participants reported that trust and collaboration improved over time.
- The structured approach facilitated effective decision-making.
- Regular meetings helped maintain momentum and communication.
- Different professional perspectives enriched the intervention development process.
Takeaway
This study shows that working together in a group helps researchers and practitioners improve health programs before testing them.
Methodology
The study used qualitative methods, including focus groups and interviews, to gather experiences from CWG members about the acceptability and effectiveness of the CWG process.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the self-led nature of the evaluation and the influence of the CWG chairs on data interpretation.
Limitations
The study is a self-led evaluation, which may introduce bias, and it relies on focus groups that may not capture all individual perspectives.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 25 members from various professional backgrounds involved in the DAFNEplus program.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website