Additives in Supplements for Grazing Beef Cattle
Author Information
Author(s): Naves Karine R. S., Moraes Kamila A. K., da Cunha Lorrayne O., Petrenko Natasha B., Ortelam Juliana C., Sousa Jarliane N., Covatti Caroline F., Nunes Dener, Chaves Carla S., de Menezes Flávio L., de Oliveira André S., Moraes Eduardo H. B. K.
Primary Institution: Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Hypothesis
The use of additives in protein–energy supplements improves the nutritional parameters of beef cattle during intensive rearing on pasture.
Conclusion
The use of sodium monensin, functional oil, and active yeast in protein–energy supplements did not significantly influence the nutritional parameters of pasture-fed beef cattle.
Supporting Evidence
- The protein–energy supplements increased total dry matter intake and crude protein intake compared to the mineral mixture.
- The additives did not significantly impact nutrient intake or digestibility.
- The study used a controlled experimental design to assess the effects of different feed additives.
Takeaway
This study looked at how different additives in cattle feed affect their health and growth. It found that these additives didn't really help the cattle eat better or grow more.
Methodology
Five male cattle were tested using a 5 × 5 Latin square design with various treatments including a mineral mixture and protein–energy supplements with or without additives.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the specific conditions of the study and the limited number of cattle tested.
Limitations
The study was limited to a small sample size and specific grazing conditions, which may not be generalizable.
Participant Demographics
Five noncastrated male Nelore cattle with an initial average body weight of 355 ± 30 kg.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p < 0.0001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website