Estimating Preferences for Dermatology Consultations
Author Information
Author(s): Terry N. Flynn, Jordan J. Louviere, Tim J. Peters, Joanna Coast
Primary Institution: University of Bristol
Hypothesis
Can best-worst scaling provide better insights into patient preferences for dermatology consultations compared to traditional methods?
Conclusion
Discrete choice experiments incorporating best-worst questions can yield robust insights into patient preferences even with small sample sizes.
Supporting Evidence
- Patients with severe skin conditions preferred shorter waiting times significantly.
- Higher educational attainment was linked to larger differences in utility between appointment attributes.
- The study found high agreement between results from different analytical models.
Takeaway
This study helps us understand what patients want when they see a skin doctor by asking them to pick their favorite and least favorite things about their appointments.
Methodology
The study used multinomial and weighted least squares regression models to analyze data from a discrete choice experiment in a UK NHS dermatology context.
Potential Biases
The study may have induced clustering in the data by obtaining multiple responses from individuals.
Limitations
The sample size was relatively small, and the study may not account for all sources of variability in patient preferences.
Participant Demographics
Participants included individuals with varying degrees of skin conditions and educational backgrounds.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Confidence Interval
[0.1048, 1.7628]
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website