Racial/ethnic differences in mental health treatment received among people with comorbid cardiometabolic and depressive symptomology: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017 to March 2020 Pre-Pandemic
2025

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Mental Health Treatment for Depression and Cardiometabolic Issues

Sample size: 9693 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Dark Tyra, Harris Rachel, Burns Desiree, Chernicky Jacob, Reid-Marks Laura, Rust George

Primary Institution: Florida State University

Hypothesis

What are the racial/ethnic mental health treatment patterns among individuals with cardiometabolic and depressive symptomology co-occurrence?

Conclusion

Simultaneously treating both mental illness and cardiometabolic symptoms is complicated, but there may be untapped synergies in treating both concurrently.

Supporting Evidence

  • Fewer than half of persons with depressive symptoms received any mental health treatment.
  • Receiving no mental health treatment was the most common designation across all racial/ethnic groups.
  • Participants with comorbid cardiometabolic and depressive symptomology have 28% lower odds of receiving combined mental health professional and medication therapy.

Takeaway

This study found that many people with depression and heart problems don't get the help they need, especially among different racial groups.

Methodology

The study used National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2017 to March 2020 and performed adjusted linear logistic regression analyses.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from provider concerns, implicit biases, or patient preferences affecting treatment types received.

Limitations

The cross-sectional nature of the dataset does not allow for causal inferences, and the study relies on self-reported medical conditions.

Participant Demographics

Participants included adults aged 18 and older, with a diverse representation across racial/ethnic groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

CI 0.493–1.041

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0316430

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication