Positioning Laboratory Automation for Today's Dynamic Climate
Author Information
Author(s): D. G. Vogt
Primary Institution: Eli Lilly and Company
Hypothesis
The implementation of 'smart systems' in laboratory automation will improve efficiency and performance.
Conclusion
The new simpler systems have proven to be more reliable and dependable than the previous complex 'smart systems'.
Supporting Evidence
- The smart systems included over 70 error trappings to improve reliability.
- Development time for new systems was reduced by more than 50% by focusing on essential features.
- Over 800 samples were run through the system before validation to ensure reliability.
Takeaway
The study shows that simpler lab automation systems work better and are easier to maintain than complicated ones.
Methodology
The study involved the development and testing of laboratory automation systems, focusing on simplifying design and functionality.
Potential Biases
The customer's comfort with technology may have led to unrealistic expectations and a steep learning curve.
Limitations
The previous systems were complex and required significant maintenance, which led to user frustration and perception of failure.
Participant Demographics
The author's group included personnel with diverse backgrounds in mechanical, electrical, computer programming, and chemistry.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website