Guidelines for Evaluating Human Observational Studies in Risk Assessment
Author Information
Author(s): Jelle Vlaanderen, Roel Heederik, Dick Kromhout, Hans
Primary Institution: Utrecht University, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences
Hypothesis
We aimed to develop guidelines for the evaluation of human observational studies for quantitative risk assessment.
Conclusion
The developed guidelines facilitate a structured evaluation that is transparent in its application and harmonizes the evaluation of human observational studies for quantitative risk assessment.
Supporting Evidence
- The framework consists of 20 evaluation criteria focused on exposure assessment quality.
- Five out of seven studies on benzene and AML were found suitable for quantitative risk assessment.
- The guidelines help identify and rank studies based on their quality.
Takeaway
This study created a set of rules to help scientists check if studies about people and their exposure to benzene are good enough to use for understanding health risks.
Methodology
A three-tiered framework was developed to evaluate human observational studies on the relation between benzene exposure and acute myeloid leukemia.
Potential Biases
Potential for bias due to limited control of study circumstances.
Limitations
Limited information provided in the evaluated publications made evaluation difficult.
Participant Demographics
Studies evaluated included various populations exposed to benzene.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website