Analytic Perspective: Age standardisation – an indigenous standard?
2007

Age Standardisation and Indigenous Health

publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Bridget Robson, Gordon Purdie, Fiona Cram, Shirley Simmonds

Primary Institution: Te Rōpū Rangahau a Eru Pōmare, University of Otago

Hypothesis

Does the choice of age standard affect health disparities data between Māori and non-Māori populations in New Zealand?

Conclusion

The choice of age standard significantly impacts mortality rates and health policy decisions regarding Māori and non-Māori populations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study found that using different age standards can change the perceived health status of Māori compared to non-Māori.
  • Mortality rates for Māori were significantly higher when using the Māori population as a standard.
  • Age-standardisation affects the ranking of causes of death, influencing health policy priorities.

Takeaway

This study shows that how we measure age can change our understanding of health differences between Māori and non-Māori people in New Zealand.

Methodology

The study compared mortality data using different age standards for Māori and non-Māori populations from 1996 to 2000.

Potential Biases

Potential undercounting of Māori in health data could skew results.

Limitations

The study relies on historical data which may not fully represent current health disparities.

Participant Demographics

The study focuses on Māori and non-Māori populations in New Zealand.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI 2.20–2.28

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1742-7622-4-3

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication