Incidence of primary care chest pain consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time series analysis with routine care data
2024

Impact of COVID-19 on Chest Pain Consultations in Primary Care

Sample size: 9908 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Simone van den Bulk, Jasper W. A. van Egeraat, Annelieke H. J. Petrus, Mattijs E. Numans, Tobias N. Bonten

Primary Institution: Leiden University Medical Center

Hypothesis

This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on the number of patients presenting with chest pain in primary care.

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 lockdown, the number of chest pain consultations and registered acute coronary syndrome diagnoses in primary care decreased significantly.

Supporting Evidence

  • Chest pain consultations decreased from 9,228 before lockdown to 680 during lockdown.
  • The incidence rate of chest pain consultations was 6.16 per 1000 person-years during lockdown compared to an expected 7.55.
  • Telephone consultations increased from 22% before lockdown to 48% during lockdown.
  • Fewer patients were referred to the hospital during lockdown, with referrals dropping from 19% to 9.9%.
  • The incidence rate ratio for chest pain consultations during lockdown was 0.62.

Takeaway

During the COVID-19 lockdown, fewer people went to their doctor for chest pain, and many were seen over the phone instead of in person.

Methodology

Routine primary care data from the Extramural LUMC Academic Network in the Netherlands were analyzed using an interrupted time series analysis.

Potential Biases

Misclassification bias may occur if GPs used different codes for chest pain or did not register hospital diagnoses accurately.

Limitations

The study is observational, which prevents drawing causal conclusions, and there is a risk of misclassification bias in the data.

Participant Demographics

Patients consulting their GP for chest pain during lockdown had a mean age of 65 years, with 57% being women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 7.03–8.12

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/s12875-024-02676-y

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication