Comparison of stroke volume changes of LiDCO™plus and Flotrac™ during postoperative hemodynamic optimization
2011

Comparison of Stroke Volume Changes During Surgery

Sample size: 27 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Costa MG, Cecconet T, Chiarandini P, Buttera S, Pompei L, Rocca G Della

Primary Institution: University of Udine, Italy

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the concordance on stroke volume index changes obtained from calibrated and uncalibrated devices during postoperative hemodynamic optimization.

Conclusion

The LiDCO™plus and Vigileo™ devices identified the same direction of changes in stroke volume in 78% of cases during postoperative hemodynamic optimization.

Supporting Evidence

  • The mean bias between LiDCO-SVI and Vigileo-SVI was 1.16 ml/m2.
  • The two devices showed the same direction of changes in 78% of the cases.
  • They agreed in 81% of cases to define responder and nonresponder.

Takeaway

Doctors used two different machines to check how well patients' hearts were doing after surgery, and they mostly agreed on the results.

Methodology

A prospective study comparing stroke volume index changes from two devices in surgical patients during early postoperative hemodynamic optimization.

Participant Demographics

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% limit of agreement from -23.36 to 25.68 ml/m2

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/cc9479

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication