Effectiveness of Dietitian-Involved Lifestyle Interventions in Diabetes Management Among Arab Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024

Dietitian-Involved Lifestyle Interventions for Diabetes Management in Arab Populations

Sample size: 8 publication 10 minutes Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Sheffer-Hilel Galia, Abd Elqader Omaima, Suliman Layla, Srulovici Einav

Primary Institution: The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, Haifa University

Hypothesis

Are dietitian-involved lifestyle interventions effective in managing diabetes among Arab populations?

Conclusion

Dietitian-involved interventions significantly improve glycemic control and metabolic outcomes among Arab populations with diabetes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Interventions involving dietitians led to significant reductions in HbA1c levels.
  • Participants showed improvements in body mass index (BMI) after dietitian-led interventions.
  • High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels increased significantly with dietitian involvement.
  • Subgroup analysis indicated that longer follow-up periods resulted in better outcomes.
  • The certainty of evidence was low due to heterogeneity and potential biases.

Takeaway

This study shows that having dietitians help people with diabetes in Arab communities can make them healthier and manage their blood sugar better.

Methodology

The study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed data from various databases, focusing on experimental and quasi-experimental studies involving dietitian-led interventions.

Potential Biases

Potential biases due to the variability in study designs and participant characteristics.

Limitations

High heterogeneity among studies and small sample sizes limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The studies included Arab populations with prediabetes and diabetes, primarily from Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Statistical Information

P-Value

-0.41

Confidence Interval

95% CI: −0.67, −0.16

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/nu16244283

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication